Physical attractiveness

Venus de Milo on display at the Louvre.
Adonis restored and completed by François Duquesnoy, formerly in the collection of Cardinal Mazarin (Louvre Museum).

Physical attractiveness is the perception of the physical traits of an individual as being aesthetically pleasing or beautiful. The term often implies sexual attractiveness.

Generally, physical attraction is dependent on three factors: universal perceptions common to all human cultures, cultural and social aspects, and individual subjective preferences. Despite universally held perceptions of beauty in both sexes, males tend to place significantly higher value on physical appearance in a partner than women do.[1][2] This can be explained by evolutionary psychology as a consequence of ancestral humans who selected partners based on secondary sexual characteristics, as well as general indicators of fitness (for example, symmetrical features) enjoying greater reproductive success as a result of higher fertility in those partners [3], although a male's ability to provide resources for offspring was likely signalled less by physical features.[1] This is because the most prominent indicator of fertility in women is youth, while the traits in a man that enhance reproductive success are proxies for his ability to accrue resources and protect.[4] There appear to be universal standards regarding attractiveness both within and across cultures and ethnic groups.[5]

Physical attractiveness can have a significant effect on how people are judged in terms of employment or social opportunities, friendship, sexual behavior, and marriage.[6] In many cases, humans attribute positive characteristics, such as intelligence and honesty, to attractive people without consciously realizing it.[7] In certain instances, physical attractiveness is distinct from sexual attraction; humans may regard the young as attractive for various reasons, for example, but without sexual attraction.

Women, on average, tend to be attracted to men who are slightly taller and who have a relatively narrow waist and broad shoulders. Men, overall, tend to be attracted by women who are slightly shorter, have a youthful appearance and exhibit features such as a symmetrical face, full breasts, full lips, and a low waist-hip ratio.[8][9]

Contents

Determinants of male physical attractiveness

Facial features

Studies have shown that ovulating heterosexual women and homosexual men prefer faces with masculine traits associated with increased testosterone, such as heavy brows, prominent chins, heavy jaws, and broad cheekbones. Women who are in the late luteal or early follicular phases of the menstrual cycle (or those taking hormonal contraception) do not prefer masculine male faces.[10][11][12] These are suggested to be a reliable indication of good health, or, alternatively, that dominant- and masculine-looking males are more likely to achieve high status.[13] However, the correlation between attractive facial features and health has been questioned.[14] Also, females tend to prefer different facial traits in short-term and long-term partners, and sociocultural factors, such as self-perceived attractiveness, status in a relationship and degree of gender-conformity, have been reported to play a role in female preferences for male faces.[15]

Symmetry

Symmetrical faces and bodies may be signs of good inheritance to women of child-bearing age seeking to create healthy offspring. Some studies suggested that women at peak fertility were more likely to fantasize about men with greater symmetry.[16] Studies suggest women are more attracted to men with symmetrical features, while this symmetry has also been shown to correlate with other variables typically associated with masculinity, such as greater height, broader shoulders, and smaller hip-to-waist ratios.[17] Facial and body symmetry may indicate good health, which is a desirable feature.[17]

V-shaped torso and muscularity

The mesomorphic physique of a slim waist, broad shoulders and muscular chest are often found to be attractive.[18] A near-universal sexually attractive feature of a man is a v-shaped torso: a relatively narrow waist offset with broad shoulders. While some cultures prefer their males huskier and others leaner, the rule of a v-shaped torso generally holds true. Consistently, men with a waist-to-shoulder ratio of 0.75 or lower are viewed as considerably more attractive than men with more even waists and shoulders.[19] A degree of hirsuteness and a waist-to-shoulder ratio of 0.6 is often preferred, when combined with a mesomorphic physique.[20]

A normal level of the hormone testosterone is a possible indicator of good sexual health. In the absence of normal testosterone levels, a man may have reduced height and muscularity.

Height and erect posture

Females' sexual attraction towards males is sometimes partly determined by the height of the man.[21] Height in men is associated with status in many cultures, which is beneficial to women romantically involved with them. This preference may have been passed on genetically.[22] As a corollary, shorter men may be viewed as less attractive, all other things being equal, for casual and intended long-term relationships. One study conducted of women's personal ads support the existence of this preference; the study found that in ads requesting height in a mate, 80 percent requested a height of 6 feet or taller.[22] However, this percentage was only of ads specifying height, and therefore possibly self-selected and/or biased by a third factor such as female height. Recent studies have shown that heterosexual women often prefer men taller than they are, over a man with above average height. Some sociologists theorize this may be because dominance is a sexually attractive characteristic of males, and a taller height subtly communicates dominance. Cosmopolitan Magazine published an article suggesting that women are most attracted to men who are 1.1 times their own height. The article also argued, on the basis of a survey of their readers, that women are statistically more likely to be attracted to men of average height when looking for long-term commitment, while the opposite is true when a short-term relationship is intended. In addition, the article claimed that women may have these different preferences for height depending on the phase of their menstrual cycle at the time.[23] While women usually desire men to be at least the same height as themselves or taller, several other factors also determine male attractiveness, and the male-taller norm is not universal.[24]

Additionally, women seem more receptive to an erect posture than men, though both prefer it as an element of beauty; this fact appears correlated to the preference for males who demonstrate confidence, physical strength, and a powerful bearing.[22]

Hairiness

Studies based in The United States, New Zealand, and China have shown that women rate men with no body hair as most attractive, and that attractiveness ratings decline as hirsutism increases.[25][26] Another study found a moderate amount of trunk hair was most attractive, to the sample of British and Sri Lankan women. [20]

Variability in preferences

It has been shown that women prefer more masculine men during the fertile period of the menstrual cycle and more feminine men during other parts of the cycle.[27] This distinction supports the sexy son hypothesis, which posits that it is evolutionarily advantageous for women to select potential fathers who are traditionally masculine rather than the best caregivers.[28] Masculine facial features are characterized by a prominent chin, strong brow, a strong nose, pronounced mouth and lips, a high forehead and a prominent lower jaw whereas feminine features are less pronounced. According to one study, men with facial scars are more attractive to Western women seeking short-term relationships; this may be due to the perception that facial scars are a symbol of high testosterone and masculinity.[29]

Determinants of female physical attractiveness

The determinants of female attractiveness include those features that display good health and fitness for reproduction and the sustenance of infants. These include the following correlates of fertility:

Features such as a symmetrical face, large breasts, and low waist-to-hip ratio are commonly considered attractive in women because they are thought to indicate physical health and high fertility to a potential mate.

Although it has been claimed that facial attractiveness and symmetry signal good health, this has been questioned .[37]

Facial alignment

In a study by University of Louisville psychologist Michael Cunningham, dimensions and proportions of what was regarded as attractive emerged with remarkable consistency. The ideal attractive female face featured "eye width that is three-tenths the width of the face at the eyes' level; chin length, one-fifth the height of the face; distance from the center of the eye to the bottom of the eyebrow, one-tenth the height of the face; the height of the visible eyeball, one-fourteenth the height of the face; the width of the pupil, one-fourteenth the distance between the cheekbones; and the total area for the nose, less than 5 percent of the area of the face."[38] Very small differences mattered; for example, "the ideal mouth was half or 50 percent the width of the face at mouth level; if that percentage varied "by as little at 10 points," the face was rated as less attractive.[38] The study found the "beauty of the female face ... is mathematically quantifiable."[38]

Desired traits were large female eyes, small chin and nose, and these "infantlike features draw out in them the same caretaking response a baby would–they make a woman seem cute and adorable."[38] Further, high wide cheekbones and narrow cheeks are "signs that a woman has reached puberty" and "high eyebrows, dilated pupils and wide smile" signal excitement and sociability.[38] One psychologist speculated there were two opposing principles of female beauty: prettiness and rarity. So average, symmetrical features is one ideal, while unusual, stand-out features is another.[39] A study performed by the University of Toronto found that the most attractive facial dimensions were those found in the average female face. However, the study looked only at white women.[40]

Signals of youth

Because female fecundity typically declines after the late twenties, youth is an important aspect of physical attractiveness.[41] One study across 37 cultures showed men desire, on average, a woman 2.5 years younger than themselves for a wife, with men in Nigeria and Zambia at the far extreme, desiring their wives to be 6.5 to 7.5 years younger. As men age, they also desire a larger age gap from their mates.[30] The reasons for this preference are currently debated.

This preference for youth has also led to a preference of neotenic and youthful-appearing features. High, firm breasts,[42][43] or long and lustrous hair (or a combination of the three),[30][42][44][45][46] full red lips,[47][48][49] clear smooth skin, and clear eyes, are viewed as attractive in women.[30]

Breast size

Full breasts may be attractive to some men in Western societies because women with higher breast to under-breast ratios typically have higher levels of the sex hormone, estradiol, which promotes fertility.[50] Larger breasts also display the aging process more noticeably, hence they are a relatively reliable indicator of long-term fertility.[51]

Proportion of body mass to body structure

This 1895 advertisement promotes a weight gain product for people who had lost significant weight through disease or age. Maintaining a healthy weight is a determinant of physical attractiveness.

The Body Mass Index (BMI) is another important universal determinant to the perception of beauty.[34] The BMI refers to the proportion of the body mass to the body structure. However, the optimal body proportion is interpreted differently in various cultures. The Western ideal considers a slim and slender body mass as optimal while many historic cultures consider an embonpoint or plump body-mass as appealing.[52][53] Men do not appear to have evolved to hold a particular build as more attractive, but rather to be drawn to whichever build associates with social status.[53]

In the United States, women overestimate men's preferences for thinness in a mate. In one study, American women were asked to choose what their ideal build was and what they thought the build most attractive to men was. Women chose slimmer than average figures for both choices, though when American men were independently asked to choose the female build most attractive to them, they (the men) chose figures of average build, indicating that women may be misled as to how thin men prefer women to be.[53] Some speculate that thinness as a beauty standard is one way in which women judge each other.[39] A reporter asked: "Why do women suffer to look like skeletons even when men don’t want them to?" and wondered whether "women's aesthetic judgments are so influenced by other women."[39] The reporter surmised that thinness is prized among women as a "sign of independence, strength and achievement."[39] Some implicated the fashion industry for the promulgation of the notion of thinness as attractive.[54]

The attraction for a proportionate body also influences an appeal for erect posture.[55]

Waist-hip ratio

Notwithstanding wide cultural differences in preferences for female build, scientists have discovered that the waist-hip ratio (WHR) of any build is very strongly correlated to attractiveness across cultures.[53] Women with a 0.7 WHR (waist circumference that is 70% of the hip circumference) are usually rated as more attractive by men from European cultures. Such diverse beauty icons as Jessica Alba,[56][57] Marilyn Monroe, Salma Hayek, Sophia Loren, and the Venus de Milo all have ratios around 0.7.[58]

Marilyn Monroe "Happy Birthday, Mr. President."

In other cultures, preferences vary,[59] ranging from 0.6 in China,[60] to 0.8 or 0.9 in parts of South America and Africa,[61][62][63] and divergent preferences based on ethnicity, rather than nationality, have also been noted.[64][65] The hourglass shape characterized by a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7 has been described as attractive.[66]

Height

Most men exhibit a preference for females of shorter physical stature than themselves.[67][68] Women .7 to 1.7 standard deviations below the mean in height have been reported to be the most reproductively successful. One explanation for this observation is that since most men demonstrate a preference for women shorter than themselves, being shorter allows a woman access to a larger potential dating pool.[67] However, in some non-Western cultures, height is irrelevant in choosing a mate, which suggests that the preference among Western men for women shorter than themselves may be sociocultural in nature.[24]

Long legs

One study suggested men prefer women with longer legs. Research compared the attractiveness of women of similar height but with different lengths of their legs and concluded that men found longer legs to be more attractive. Researchers hypothesized that longer legs were not only an aesthetic feature but indicated good health.[69]

Prototypicality as beauty

Besides biology and culture, there are other factors determining physical attractiveness. The more common features a face bears, the more highly it is usually judged to be attractive. This may be a result of the familiarity of common facial features, an example of the mere exposure effect. When many faces are combined into a composite image (through computer morphing), people usually view the resulting image as more familiar, attractive, and beautiful than the faces that were combined to make the composite.[70]

One interpretation is that this shows an inherent human preference for prototypicality. That is, the resultant face emerges with the salient features shared by most faces, and hence becomes the prototype. The prototypical face and features is therefore perceived as symmetrical and familiar. This may reveal an "underlying preference for the familiar and safe over the unfamiliar and potentially dangerous."[35] However, critics of this interpretation point out that compositing computer images also has the effect of removing skin blemishes such as scars, and generally softens sharp facial features.

Classical conceptions of beauty are essentially a celebration of this "prototypicality." This may show the importance of prototypicality in the judgment of beauty, and also explain the emergence of similarity of the perception of attractiveness within a community or society, which shares a gene pool.

Skin tone

Skin tone preference varies by culture. Many historically favored and continue to favor lighter skin in women. In his foreword to Peter Frost's 2005 Fair Women, Dark Men, University of Washington sociologist Pierre L. van den Berghe writes: "Although virtually all cultures express a marked preference for fair female skin, even those with little or no exposure to European imperialism, and even those whose members are heavily pigmented, many are indifferent to male pigmentation or even prefer men to be darker."[71] A consequence of this is that, since higher-ranking men get to marry the more attractive women, the upper classes of a society generally tend to develop a lighter complexion than the lower classes by sexual selection (see also Fisherian runaway).[72]

Contrasting this is the recent Western preference for tanned skin.[73][74][75] Tanned skin has been shown in Western culture to be viewed both as more attractive and more healthy than pale skin.[76]Though sun-tanned skin used to be associated with the sun-exposed manual labor of the lower-class, the associations became dramatically reversed in the mid-20th century, a change usually credited to the trendsetting French woman, Coco Chanel, making tanned skin seem fashionable, healthy, and luxurious.[77]

In eastern parts of Asia, including Southeast Asia, a preference for lighter skin remains prevalent.[78] This is not a recent development, and in China, for example, can be traced back to ancient drawings depicting women and goddesses with fair skin tones. Western culture has been credited with reinforcing this ideal as advertisements featuring Western models and light-skinned Asians associated paleness with social class. In East Asia in particular, fair skin is associated with beauty and youth, since skin darkens with exposure to the sun and aging. Thus, skin whitening cosmetic products are popular in East Asia. Despite the risks of skin damage and skin cancer, 4 out of 10 women surveyed in Hong Kong, Malaysia, the Philippines and South Korea used a skin-whitening cream, and more than 60 companies globally compete for Asia's estimated $18 billion market.[78]

The perception of beauty can be influenced by racial stereotypes about skin color; the African American journalist Jill Nelson wrote that "to be both prettiest and black was impossible"[79] and elaborated:

As a girl and young woman, hair, body, and color were society's trinity in determining female beauty and identity, the cultural and value-laden gang of three that formed the boundaries and determined the extent of women's visibility, influence, and importance. For the most part, they still are. We learn as girls that in ways both subtle and obvious, personal and political, our value as females is largely determined by how we look. As we enter womanhood, the pervasive power of this trinity is demonstrated again and again in how we are treated by the men we meet, the men we work for, the men who wield power, how we treat each other and, most of all, ourselves. For black women, the domination of physical aspects of beauty in women's definition and value render us invisible, partially erased, or obsessed, sometimes for a lifetime, since most of us lack the major talismans of Western beauty. Black women find themselves involved in a lifelong effort to self-define in a culture that provides them no positive reflection.[79]

Gender differences on importance of physical attractiveness

Studies generally show that men on average place greater emphasis on physical attractiveness than women do, with women being more attracted to personality-based traits by comparison.[1] A 2003 study in the area concluded that heterosexual women are about equally aroused when viewing men or women. Heterosexual men were only aroused by women. This study verified arousal in the test subjects by connecting them to brain imaging devices.[80][81][82][83]

Social effects of attractiveness

When a person is seen as attractive or unattractive, assumptions are brought into play. Across cultures, what is beautiful is assumed to be good. Attractive people are assumed to be more extroverted, popular, and happy. This could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy; from a young age, attractive people receive more attention that helps them develop these characteristics.[84][85] But attractiveness varies by society; in ancient China, a small foot was considered attractive, so foot binding was practiced by confining young girls' feet in tightly bound shoes to prevent the feet from growing to normal size.[86]

Physical attractiveness can have various effects. A survey conducted by London Guildhall University of 11,000 people showed that those who subjectively describe themselves as physically attractive earn more income than others who would describe themselves as less attractive.[87] People who described themselves as less attractive earned, on average, 13% less than those who described themselves as more attractive, while the penalty for being overweight was around 5%. It is important to note that other factors such as self-confidence may explain or influence these findings as they are based on self-reported attractiveness as opposed to any sort of objective criteria; however, as one's self-confidence and self-esteem are largely learned from how one is regarded by his/her peers while maturing, even these considerations would suggest a significant role for physical appearance. One writer speculated that "the distress created in women by the spread of unattainable ideals of female beauty" might possibly be linked to increasing incidents of depression.[88]

Many have asserted that certain advantages tend to come to those who are perceived as being more attractive, including the ability to get better jobs and promotions; receiving better treatment from authorities and the legal system; having more choices in romantic partners and, therefore, more power in relationships; and marrying into families with more money.[84][85][89]

Both men and women use physical attractiveness as a measure of how 'good' another person is.[90] Some have proposed that discrimination against or prejudice towards others based on their appearance should be referred to as Lookism.

Some researchers conclude that little difference exists between men and women in terms of sexual behavior.[91][92] Symmetrical men and women have a tendency to begin to have sexual intercourse at an earlier age, to have more sexual partners, to engage in a wider variety of sexual activities, and to have more one-night stands. They are also prone to infidelity and are more likely to have open relationships.[93] Additionally, they have the most reproductive success. Therefore, their physical characteristics are most likely to be inherited by future generations.[94][95][96][97]

Columnist Maureen Dowd thought that the feminist movement would have changed the rules regarding beauty, but concluded after forty years that "the ideal of feminine beauty is more rigid and unnatural than ever" and she still felt imprisoned by the "tyranny of the girdled, primped ideal of the 50's."[98] She wrote:

What I don't like now is that the young women rejecting the feminist movement are dressing alike, looking alike and thinking alike. The plumage is more colorful, the shapes are more curvy, the look is more plastic, the message is diametrically opposite - before it was don't be a sex object; now it's be a sex object - but the conformity is just as stifling.[98]

Embracing ugliness

Abraham Lincoln was characterized as "ugly", but his appearance also generated sympathy and support.[99]

Physical ugliness is the subjective perception that a person is aesthetically unattractive or repulsive.[100] For some, ugliness is a central aspect of their persona. Jean-Paul Sartre had a lazy eye and a bloated, asymmetrical face; he attributed many of his philosophical ideas to his life-long struggle to come to terms with his self-described ugliness.[101] Socrates also used his ugliness as a philosophical touch point, concluding that philosophy, through finding beauty in truth, can save us from our outward ugliness.[101] Famous in his own time for his perceived ugliness, Abraham Lincoln was described by a contemporary: "to say that he is ugly is nothing; to add that his figure is grotesque, is to convey no adequate impression." However, his looks proved to be an asset in his personal and political relationships, as his law partner William Herndon wrote, "He was not a pretty man by any means, nor was he an ugly one; he was a homely man, careless of his looks, plain-looking and plain-acting. He had no pomp, display, or dignity, so-called. He appeared simple in his carriage and bearing. He was a sad-looking man; his melancholy dripped from him as he walked. His apparent gloom impressed his friends, and created sympathy for him - one means of his great success."[99] The Israeli statesman and military leader Moshe Dayan was facially disfigured fighting fascists during World War II. At first the loss of his eye caused him emotional pain, he wrote in his autobiography "I reflected with considerable misgivings on my future as a cripple without a skill, trade, or profession to provide for my family." He added that he was "ready to make any effort and stand any suffering, if only I could get rid of my black eye patch. The attention it drew was intolerable to me. I preferred to shut myself up at home, doing anything, rather than encounter the reactions of people wherever I went."[102] However, as he rose in the Israeli government his disfigurement became an asset- an always visible reminder of his sacrifices- which made him instantly recognizable and sympathetic.

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. pp. 57, 58, 60–63. 
  2. Stephen J. Dubner (July 9, 2007). "The Science of Large Breasts, and Other Evolutionary Verities". The New York Times. http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/the-science-of-large-breasts-and-other-evolutionary-verities/?apage=3. Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  3. Symons D. 1995. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture: Chicago Series on Sexuality, History, and Society, ed. PR Abramson, SD Pinkerton, pp. 80–119. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  4. Abigail Trafford, Andrew Cherlin (Mar. 6, 2001). "Second Opinion: Men's Health & Marriage". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/liveonline/01/health/health0306.htm. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "The major reason for the imbalance between men and women in the later decades of life is because men tend to marry younger women as they get older." 
  5. Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review," J.H. Langlois, L. Kalakanis, A.J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam, & M. Smoot, Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 126, 390-423.
  6. Lorenz, Kate. (2005). "Do Pretty People Earn More?" www.CNN.com.
  7. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E. (1972). "What is beautiful is good." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290.
  8. Tall men 'top husband stakes'. BBC News. Retrieved 15 October 2009.
  9. Daniel Nettle: Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. The Royal Society. Retrieved 15 October 2009.
  10. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Rhodes G. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226.
  11. Glassenberg, AN, Feinberg, DF, Jones, BC, Little, AC, Debruine, LM.(2009) Sex-Dimorphic Face Shape Preference in Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women. Arch Sex Behavior. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19830539)
  12. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6696/full/394884a0.html
  13. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Fink B, Neave N, Seydel H. Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):82-7.
  14. Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S93-5.
  15. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. Cellerino A. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(3 Suppl):45-8.
  16. Tim Radford (17 August 2005). "How women dream of symmetrical men". London: The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/aug/17/genderissues.research. Retrieved 2010-01-19. "The research once again confirms a hypothesis that beauty is not merely in the eye of the beholder: it is an indicator of genetic fitness. From a choice of computer-generated faces, volunteers routinely choose the most symmetrical as the most attractive. Physical symmetry is interpreted as a sign of good inheritance. And therefore, the theory goes, women in a position to conceive would be more attracted to someone more likely to engender the healthiest offspring." 
  17. 17.0 17.1 Stephen Khan and Roger Dobson (2 October 2005). "A symmetrical face isn't just prettier - it's healthier too". London: The Independent: Science. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/a-symmetrical-face-isnt-just-prettier--its-healthier-too-509285.html. Retrieved 2010-01-19. "For the perfectly proportioned face is also an indication that the body it sits atop is well prepared to fight off infection. The common cold, asthma and flu are all more likely to be combated efficiently by those whose left side matches their right." 
  18. Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters" in Archives of Sexual Behavior Volume 10, No 1 1981.
  19. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article855409.ece Women seduced by ‘V man’ with a matted chest from www.timesonline.com.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Dixson, A. F. Halliwell, G. East, R. Wignarajah, P. Anderson, M. J. Archives of Sexual Behavior February 2003 Volume 32 Number 1 pp.29-39.
  21. Pierce C. A. 1996; Cunningham, M.R. 1990; Pawlowski B, Dunbar RI, Lipowicz A 2000.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. pp. 38–40. 
  23. Sohn, E. Health, Nov2005, Vol. 19 Issue 9.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Biol Lett. 2009 Oct 23;5(5):606-9. How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Sear R, Marlowe FW.
  25. http://www.springerlink.com/content/y520080w61511h1m/ Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness in Men and Women: A New Zealand-U.S. Comparative Study. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Bishop PJ, Parish A. Arch Sex Behav. 2009
  26. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li B, Anderson MJ. Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):88-95.
  27. "Women's choice of men goes in cycles". BBC News. 1999-06-24. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/376321.stm. Retrieved 30 November 2006. 
  28. University of Michigan.
  29. Men with facial scars more attractive to women
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. pp. 51–54. 
  31. Singh, D 1993
  32. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3682657.stm Hourglass figure fertility link - BBC News
  33. Ellison, Joann Rodgers. Sex: A Natural History, Macmillan, 2003, pg. 102 ISBN 0-8050-7281-0, 9780805072815
  34. 34.0 34.1 Tovee MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. 1998
  35. 35.0 35.1 Berscheid and Reis, 1998
  36. Fink, B. & Penton-Voak, I.S. (2002)
  37. Kalick, S. Michael; Zebrowitz, Leslie A.; Langlois, Judith H.; Johnson, Robert M. (January 1998). "Does Human Facial Attractiveness Honestly Advertise Health". Psychological Science 9 (1): 8–13. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00002. JSTOR 40063239. 
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 DANIEL GOLEMAN (August 5, 1986). "EQUATION FOR BEAUTY EMERGES IN STUDIESEQUATION FOR BEAUTY EMERGES IN STUDIES". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/05/science/equation-for-beauty-emerges-in-studies.html?&pagewanted=all. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "Dimensions and proportions of what was regarded as attractive emerged with remarkable consistency and precision from Dr. Cunningham's research." 
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 John Tierney (January 18, 2007). "The Waif From Ipanema". New York Times. http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/the-waif-from-ipanema/. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "women’s aesthetic judgments are so influenced by other women. Men prefer the wider hips, and most likely could care less about high heels and handbags. Yet for many women all these things are essential to marking their beauty status with other women" 
  40. "Perfect face dimensions measured". BBC News. 2009-12-18. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8421076.stm. Retrieved 2010-05-22. 
  41. Sex Differences: Developmental and Evolutionary Strategies by Linda Mealey and Mother Nature by Sarah Hrdy.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Las Vegas Weekly - What's that in your genes?
  43. Buss, David M. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pg. 325 ISBN 0-471-26403-2, 9780471264033
  44. "Recession Chic: why blondes are having more fun" By Carolyn Asome - The Times
  45. Sherrow, Victoria. Encyclopedia of hair: a cultural history Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006, pg. 149 ISBN 0-313-33145-6, 9780313331459
  46. Buss, David M. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 2005, pg. 309 ISBN 0-471-26403-2, 9780471264033
  47. Brizendine, Louann The Female Brain Random House, Inc., 2006, pg. 63 ISBN 0-7679-2010-4, 9780767920100
  48. http://newhumanist.org.uk/2051 Red Alert - New Humanist
  49. Liebmann-Smith, Joan /Egan, Jacqueline Nardi.Body Signs: How to Be Your Own Diagnostic Detective, Random House, Inc., 2007, pg. 102 ISBN 0-553-80507-X, 9780553805079
  50. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3682657.stm Hourglass figure fertility link - BBC News
  51. "Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective" in Evolutionary Psychology Handbook, Lawrence S. Sugiyama (2005).
  52. Cunningham, M.R., Roberts, A.R., Barbee, A.P., Druen, P.B., & Wu, C.H. 1995
  53. 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. pp. 55,56. 
  54. Nanci Hellmich (2006-09-26). "Do thin models warp girls' body image?". USA TODAY. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-09-25-thin-models_x.htm. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "The widespread concern that model thinness has progressed from willowy to wasted has reached a threshold as evidenced by the recent actions of fashion show organizers." 
  55. Furnham, Adrian, Gianna Caroline Fischer, Lauren Tanner, Melanie Dias, and Alastair McClelland 1998.
  56. "Jessica Alba has the perfect wiggle, study says". The Daily Telegraph (London). 2007-08-25. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561306/Jessica-Alba-has-the-perfect-wiggle-study-says.html. Retrieved 2010-05-22. 
  57. http://gizmodo.com/293838/mathemeticians-figure-out-what-makes-women-beautiful
  58. BMI and Waist-hip Ratio: The Magic Number for Health and Beauty
  59. Fisher, M.L.; Voracek M. (June 2006). "The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness". J Cosmet Dermatol 5 (2): 190–4. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x. PMID 17173598. 
  60. Dixson, B.J.; Dixson A.F., Li B., Anderson M.J. (January 2007). "Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China". Am J Hum Biol 19 (1): 88–95. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20584. PMID 17160976. 
  61. Marlowe, F.; Wetsman, A. (2001). "Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology" (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences 30 (3): 481–489. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00039-8. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/%7Ehbe-lab/acrobatfiles/preferred%20waist.pdf. Retrieved 2007-08-04. 
  62. Marlowe, F.W.; Apicella, C.L. and Reed, D. (2005). "Men’s Preferences for Women’s Profile Waist-Hip-Ratio in Two Societies" (PDF). Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 458–468. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hbe-lab/acrobatfiles/profilewhr.pdf. Retrieved 2007-08-04. 
  63. Dixson, B.J.; Dixson A.F., Morgan B., Anderson M.J. (June 2007). "Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon". Arch Sex Behav 36 (3): 369–75. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8. PMID 17136587. 
  64. Freedman, R.E.; Carter M.M., Sbrocco T., Gray JJ. (August 2007). "Do men hold African-American and Caucasian women to different standards of beauty?". Eat Behav 8 (3): 319–33. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.11.008. PMID 17606230. 
  65. Freedman, R.E.; Carter M.M., Sbrocco T., Gray J.J. (July 2004). "Ethnic differences in preferences for female weight and waist-to-hip ratio: a comparison of African-American and White American college and community samples". Eat Behav. 5 (3): 191–8. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.01.002. PMID 15135331. 
  66. Sharon Begley (December 3, 2008). "Hourglass Figures: We Take It All Back". Newsweek. http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/labnotes/archive/2008/12/03/hourglass-figures-we-take-it-all-back.aspx. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "specifically, that men prefer women with an hourglass shape because that is a sign of fertility" 
  67. 67.0 67.1 BBC News: “Tall men ‘top husband stakes’”
  68. http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/daniel.nettle/procroysoc.pdf
  69. Sorokowski P., Pawlowski B. (2008) (Jan. 03, 2008). "Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner". Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 86-91.. http://www.ehbonline.org/article/PIIS1090513807000906/abstract. Retrieved 2010-03-29. "Researchers asked more than 200 male and female volunteers to rate the attractiveness of seven male and female images. All the people in the images were same the height, but each had different leg lengths, which varied 5, 10 and 15 percent longer than the social norm. The majority preferred legs 5 percent longer than average, followed by those that were 10 percent longer." 
  70. Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. pp. 54,55. 
  71. see Steve Sailer, Blondes Have Deeper Roots (2005)
  72. Peter Frost "Fair Women, Dark Men: The Forgotten Roots of Color Prejudice," (2005).
  73. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119318887/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
  74. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119292742/abstract
  75. http://www.physorg.com/news78679968.html
  76. Singer, Merrill; Hans Beyer (28 July 2008). Killer Commodities: Public Health and the Corporate Production of Harm. AltaMira Press. p. 151. ISBN 0759109796. http://books.google.com/?id=64xpa-rhHLgC&pg=PA151&dq=sun+tan+lower+class&q=. Retrieved 11 September 2009. "Harris investigated the history of the parasol... everywhere ordinary people were forbidden to protect themselves with such devices "pallid skin became a marker of upper-class status". At the beginning of the 20th Century, in the United States, lighter-skinned people avoided the sun... Tanned skin was considered lower class." 
  77. Hanson, M.D., Peter G.. "About Face". The Effects of Aging, Health and Stress on Your Face. Face Master. http://www.dnronline.com/news_details.php?AID=11699&CHID=11. "French trend-setter Coco Chanel had an accidental sunburn when visiting the Riviera. Her fans liked the look..., and the fad began to gain popularity. Parisians also loved Josephine Baker, the American singer, and wanted to darken their skin to look more like her. So these two women basically changed the image of a tan into something desirable, healthy, and luxurious." 
  78. 78.0 78.1 http://www.pri.org/world/asia/skin-whitening-big-business-asia.html
  79. 79.0 79.1 Jill Nelson (1997). "Straight, No Chaser—How I Became a Grown-Up Black Woman— WHO'S THE FAIREST OF THEM ALL?". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/n/nelson-straight.html. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "As a girl and young woman, hair, body, and color were society's trinity in determining female beauty and identity... We learn as girls that in ways both subtle and obvious, personal and political, our value as females is largely determined by how we look." 
  80. Study on differences in Male, Female sexuality. June 2003. [1]
  81. Federally funded study measures arousal. [2]
  82. New York Times. "What do women want?" Study on human sexuality. [3]
  83. ScienceDaily. "Study Suggests Difference Between Female And Male Sexuality"[4]
  84. 84.0 84.1 Cash, T.F; Gillen, B; & Burns, D.S; 1977
  85. 85.0 85.1 Clark, M.S; & Mills, J. (1979)
  86. JONATHAN E. BERMAN (letter to the editor) (November 30, 1993). "Understand Female Genital Mutilation, Yes, but Don't Condone It". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/30/opinion/l-understand-female-genital-mutilation-yes-but-don-t-condone-it-015393.html. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "The desired mark of beauty, put in plain language, was a set of withered or amputated toes at the end of crippled feet, which were jammed into the smallest possible slipper." 
  87. http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/Careers/07/08/looks/ Do Pretty People Earn More from cnn.com
  88. DANIEL GOLEMAN (December 8, 1992). "A Rising Cost Of Modernity: Depression". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/08/science/a-rising-cost-of-modernity-depression.html. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "Competing explanations range from a loss of beliefs in God or an afterlife that can buffer people against life's setbacks, to the stresses of industrialization, to the distress created in women by the spread of unattainable ideals of female beauty, to exposure to toxic substances." 
  89. De Santis, A; and Kayson, W. A; 1999
  90. Science rewrites the rules of attraction
  91. Cowley, Geoffrey. "The Biology of beauty". Newsweek. June 3, 1996
  92. Sexual atrractiveness predicted by voice attractiveness
  93. Etcoff pp.50-53,185-187
  94. Rhodes, Gillian; Zebrowitz, Leslie, A. (2002). Facial Attractiveness - Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives. Ablex. ISBN 1567506364. 
  95. Edler R. J. "Background Considerations to Facial Aesthetics", (British) Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2001, pp. 159-168.
  96. Zaidel D. W., Aarde S. M., and Baig, K. "Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces", Brain and Cognition 57(3):(2005) pp. 261-263.
  97. Evolution producing more 'beautiful' women
  98. 98.0 98.1 MAUREEN DOWD (October 30, 2005). "What's a Modern Girl to Do?". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/30feminism.html?pagewanted=print. Retrieved 2009-11-06. "Keep thinking of yourself as a soft, mysterious cat... Men are fascinated by bright, shiny objects, by lots of curls, lots of hair on the head ... by bows, ribbons, ruffles and bright colors... Sarcasm is dangerous. Avoid it altogether." 
  99. 99.0 99.1 Carpenter, F. B. (1866). Six Months at the White House with Abraham Lincoln. New York: Hurd and Houghton. 
  100. Webster's New World College Dictionary, 3rd edition, 1995.
  101. 101.0 101.1 Martin, Andy (August 10, 2010). "The Phenomenology of Ugly". New York Times. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/10/the-phenomenology-of-ugly/. Retrieved 24 August 2010. 
  102. Dayan, Moshe (1978). Story of My Life. 

References and bibliography

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395-424.
  • Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47-51.
  • Buss, D. M. (1992). Do women have evolved preferences for men with resources? Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 401-408.
  • Buss, David (2003) [1994] (hardcover). The Evolution of Desire (second ed.). New York: Basic Books. 
  • Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
  • Cash, T.F; Gillen, B; & Burns, D.S; (1977) "Sexism and 'beautyism' in personnel consultant decision making." Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301-310.
  • Clark, M.S; & Mills, J. (1979) "Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
  • Cunningham, M.R. (1990) "What do women want." Journal of personality & social psychology, 59, 61-72.
  • Cunningham, M.R.; Roberts, A.R.; Barbee, A. P.; Duren P.B.; & Wu, C.H.; (1995) "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and Variability in the cross cultural perception of female physical attractiveness". Journal of Personality & social psychology, 68, 261 - 279.
  • De Santis, A.; and Kayson, W. A.; (1999) "Defendants charactersitics of attractiveness, race, & sex and sentencing decisions." Psychological reports, 81. 679 - 683.
  • Ellen Berscheid and Harry T. Reis. "Attraction and Close Relationships". In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey, editors, Handbook of Social Psychology, pages 193-281. New York: McGrawHill, 1998.
  • Etcoff, Nancy (1996) Survival of the Prettiest:the science of beauty, New York, Anchor Books ISBN 0-385-47942-5
  • Fanzio, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 19-33.
  • Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Law Smith MJ, Moore FR, DeBruine LM, Cornwell RE, Hillier SG, Perrett DI. Horm Behav. 2006 Feb;49(2):215-22. Epub August 1, 2005.
  • Fink, B. & Penton-Voak, I.S. (2002). Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5). 154-158.
  • Fisher, Helen. (2004) Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love, Henry Holt and Co.,
  • Furnham, Adrian, Melanie Dias, and Alastair McClelland (1998) The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles 39:311-26.
  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A.P. & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian Aesthetics: Sexual Selection and the Biology of Beauty. Biological Reviews, 78(3), 385-407.
  • Harper, B. "Beauty, Statute and the Labour Market: A British Cohort Study", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62, December 2000, pp773–802. Press release and summary
  • Hughes, S.M., & Gallup, G.G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior. Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173-178.
  • Kasser, T. and Sharma, Y. S. (1999). Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females' preference for resource acquisition characteristics in mates. Psychological Science, 10: 374-377.
  • Katch, F. I. (1993). The body profile analysis system (BPAS) to estimate ideal body size and shape: Application to ballet dancers and gymnasts. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 71, 69-83.
  • Pawlowski B, Dunbar RI, Lipowicz A (2000) Evolutionary fitness: tall men have more reproductive success;Nature,13 January 2000, n. 403 (6766):156
  • Pierce C. A. (1996) Body Height and Romantic Attraction: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Male-Taller Norm, Social Behavior and Personality,24 (2), 143-150
  • Rhode, Deborah L. (2010). The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0195372875; ISBN-13: 978-0195372878
  • Rikowski, A., & Grammer, K. (1999). Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness Proceedings. of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 869-874.
  • Singh, D. (1995). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1089-1101.
  • Singh, D; (1993) "Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist - to - hip ratio". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293 - 307
  • Tovee MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. (1998) Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet; 352(9127):548
  • Victor S. Johnstona, Rebecca Hagela, Melissa Franklinb, Bernhard Finkc, Karl Grammerc, Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 251-267 (July 2001)
  • Waynforth, D. (2001) Mate Choice Trade-offs and Women's Preference for Physically Attractive Men. Human Nature 12:207-219.

External links